Oír con un implante Coclear
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
A. J. Oxenham and S. P. Bacon, “Psychophysical Manifestations of Listeners,” in From Cochlea to Cochlear Implants, 2004, pp. 62–106.
R. L. Freyman and G. P. Nerbonne, “The Importance of Consotant - Vowel Intensity Ratio in the Intelligibility of Voiceless Consonants,” J. Speech Hear. Res., vol. 32, no. September 1989, pp. 524–535, 1989.
R. L. Freyman, G. P. Nerbonne, and H. A. Cote, “Effect of consonant-vowel ratio modification on amplitude envelope cues for consonant recognition,” J. Speech Hear. Res., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 415–426, 1991, doi: 10.1044/ jshr.3402.415.
F. Qian-Jie and R. V. Shannon, “Effects of Dynamic Range and Amplitude Mapping on Phoneme Recognition in Nucleus- 22 Cochlear Implant Users,” Ear Hear., vol. 21, pp. 227–235, 2000.
P. W. Dawson, A. E. Vandali, M. R. Knight, and J. M. Heasman, “Clinical evaluation of expanded input dynamic range in nucleus cochlear implants,” Ear Hear., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 163–176, 2007, doi: 10.1097/AUD. 0b013e3180312651.
A. J. Spahr, M. F. Dorman, and L. H. Loiselle, “Performance of patients using different cochlear implant systems: Effects of input dynamic range,” Ear Hear., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 260–275, 2007, doi: 10.1097/AUD. 0b013e3180312607.
J. M. Cornejo, A. K. Quintana, N. E. Beltran, and P. Granados, “Measuring implanted patient response to tone pips,” Biomed. Eng. Online, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12938- 020-00844-6.
J. M. Cornejo, A. K. Quintana, L. Carranco, and M. P. Granados, “Cochlear Implant Pediatric Patient THR-Level Determination Based on Electrical Cochlear Response,” in IFMBE Proceedings, 2022, pp. 153–161.
W. E. Brownell, and B. R. Alford. “How the ear works -nature´s solutions for listening,” The Volta Review, vol. 99, no. 5, pp 9-28, http://www. bcm.tmc.edu/oto/research/cochlea/ Volta/index.html
R. L. Freyman and G. P. Nerbonne, “The Importance of Consotant - Vowel Intensity Ratio in the Intelligibility of Voiceless Consonants,” J. Speech Hear. Res., vol. 32, no. September 1989, pp. 524–535, 1989.
R. L. Freyman, G. P. Nerbonne, and H. A. Cote, “Effect of consonant-vowel ratio modification on amplitude envelope cues for consonant recognition,” J. Speech Hear. Res., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 415–426, 1991, doi: 10.1044/ jshr.3402.415.
F. Qian-Jie and R. V. Shannon, “Effects of Dynamic Range and Amplitude Mapping on Phoneme Recognition in Nucleus- 22 Cochlear Implant Users,” Ear Hear., vol. 21, pp. 227–235, 2000.
P. W. Dawson, A. E. Vandali, M. R. Knight, and J. M. Heasman, “Clinical evaluation of expanded input dynamic range in nucleus cochlear implants,” Ear Hear., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 163–176, 2007, doi: 10.1097/AUD. 0b013e3180312651.
A. J. Spahr, M. F. Dorman, and L. H. Loiselle, “Performance of patients using different cochlear implant systems: Effects of input dynamic range,” Ear Hear., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 260–275, 2007, doi: 10.1097/AUD. 0b013e3180312607.
J. M. Cornejo, A. K. Quintana, N. E. Beltran, and P. Granados, “Measuring implanted patient response to tone pips,” Biomed. Eng. Online, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12938- 020-00844-6.
J. M. Cornejo, A. K. Quintana, L. Carranco, and M. P. Granados, “Cochlear Implant Pediatric Patient THR-Level Determination Based on Electrical Cochlear Response,” in IFMBE Proceedings, 2022, pp. 153–161.
W. E. Brownell, and B. R. Alford. “How the ear works -nature´s solutions for listening,” The Volta Review, vol. 99, no. 5, pp 9-28, http://www. bcm.tmc.edu/oto/research/cochlea/ Volta/index.html
Published
2024-12-10
How to Cite
Manuel Cornejo, J., Castañeda, N., Granados, M. del P., & Carranco Hernández, L. (2024). Oír con un implante Coclear. Contactos, Revista De Educación En Ciencias E Ingeniería, (137), 75 - 84. Retrieved from https://contactos.izt.uam.mx/index.php/contactos/article/view/446
Section
Artículos
