Dinámica a otro nivel

Ecología de metacomunidades

  • Monserrat Jiménez Posdoctorado CONAHCyT. Departamento de Biología, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. Unidad Iztapalapa
  • José Alejandro Zavala Hurtado Departamento de Biología, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. Unidad Iztapalapa
  • Esperanza Córdova Acosta Departamento de Biología, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. Unidad Iztapalapa
  • Ernesto Vega Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Keywords: Metacommunities, turnover, mass effect, nested subsets

Abstract

This paper analyses the structure and dynamics of metacommunities, emphasizing that natural communities are dynamic systems and not independent of regional processes. It presents theoretical models of metacommunity organization that describe patterns of this level of organization. These include the Clementsian, Gleasonian, uniform distribution, random and nested sets models. To analyze the structure of metacommunities, three key elements are used: coherence, species turnover and range boundary clustering. These structures would be defined by different combinations of deterministic and stochastic factors that influence the metacommunity structure. These factors would be integrated into the models of patch dynamics, species selection, mass effect and neutral. The metacommunity approach is fundamental to understand and confront processes such as land use change, habitat fragmentation and climate change.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chase, J. M. Drought mediates the importance of stochastic community assembly. PNAS, 104, pp.17430-17434, 2007.

Clements, F. Plant succession: an analysis of the development of the vegetation. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, 1916, pp.499.

Gleason, H. A. Further views on the succession concept. Ecology, 8, pp.299-326,1927.

Leibold, M. A. y Mikkelson, G. M. Coherence, species turnover and boundary clumping: elements of metacommunity structure. Oikos, 97, pp. 237-250, 2002.

Leibold, M. A., Holyoak, M., Mouquet, M., Amarasekare, P., Chase, J. M., Hoopes, M. F., Holt, R. D. J., Shurin, B., Law, R., Tilman, D., Loreau M. y Gonzalez, A. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecology Letters 7, pp. 601-613, 2004.

Mouquet, N. y M. Loreau. Coexistence in metacommunities: the regional similarity hypothesis. The American Naturalist, 159, pp.420-425, 2002.

Patterson BD, Atmar W. Nested subset and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagos. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 28, pp.65-82, 1986.
[https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1986.tb01749.x]

Presley, S.J., Willig, M.R. Gradients and the structure of neotropical metacommunites: effects of disturbance, elevation, landscape, and biogeography. In Myster, R.W. (eds) Neotropical Gradients and Their Analysis. Springer: Cham. 2023, pp.419-450. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22848-3_15]

Simberloff, D. Competition theory, hypothesis testing, and other community ecological buzzwords. American Naturalist, 122, pp.626-635, 1983. [https://doi.org/10.1086/284163]

Tilman D. Resource competition and community structure. Monographs in Population Biology 17. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp.296, 1982. ISBN:9780691083025
Published
2025-10-09
How to Cite
Jiménez, M., Zavala Hurtado , J. A., Córdova Acosta , E., & Vega , E. (2025). Dinámica a otro nivel: Ecología de metacomunidades. Contactos, Revista De Educación En Ciencias E Ingeniería, (143), 94 - 102. Retrieved from https://contactos.izt.uam.mx/index.php/contactos/article/view/604
Section
Artículos