Responsabilidad compartida entre Ciencia y Bioética en la experimentación con animales

  • Yessica Heras Romero 1Departamento de Física, División de Ciencias Básicas e Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Iztapalapa
  • Axayácatl Morales Guadarrama 2Departamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica, División de Ciencias Básicas e Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma Metroapolitana, Unidad Iztapalapa
  • Elizabeth Téllez Ballesteros 3Departamento de Biología Educativa, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM
Keywords: animal research, Animal Welfare, Bioethics, shared responsibility

Abstract

Bioethics in the use of animals in biomedical research aims to balance scientific progress with ethical responsibility, promoting practices that minimize animal suffering and optimize the quality of results. This paper highlights the relevance of animals in basic and clinical medical research, underlining their role in understanding biological processes and developing therapies. However, it also discusses how the adoption of principles such as the 3Rs (replacement, reduction, and refinement) has contributed to reducing their use globally, supported by advanced technologies such as organson- a-chip and computational models. In addition, it proposes the strategy of shared responsibility between Science and Bioethics that highlights the importance of global collaboration between scientists, institutions and society to guarantee humanitarian and responsible practices. Moving towards a more ethical, innovative and sustainable science requires a commitment to animal welfare, compliance with regulations and the integration of alternative approaches that respect contemporary ethical values.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baumans, V. The welfare of laboratory animals. Laboratory Animals, 52[5], pp. 481-490, 2018.

Broom, D. M. Cognitive ability and awareness in domestic animals and decisions about obligations to animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 187, pp. 1-9, 2017. Kilkenny, C., Browne, W. J., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M., & Altman, D. G. Improving bioscience research reporting: The arrive guidelines. PLOS Biology, 8[6], 2019.

OMSA-Organización Mundial de Sanidad Animal, Código Sanitario para los Animales Terrestres. Capítulo 7.1, https:// www.woah.org/es/que-hacemos/normas/ codigos-y-manuales/acceso-en-linea-al-codigo- terrestre/

Olsson, I. A. S., Franco, N. H., & Sandøe, P. Ethical regulation of animal research. Bioethics, 31[4], 245-251, 2017.

Reinhardt, V. The well-being of laboratory animals. Animal Welfare, 28[3], 207- 212, 2019.

Regan, Tom. En defensa de los derechos de los animales, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, 2016.

Russell, William y Burch, Rex, The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, 1959, cap. 4, http://altweb.jhsph.edu/pubs/ books/humane_exp/chap4d

Singer, P. Liberación animal, 2ª ed, Madrid, España: Trotta, 1999

Taylor, P.W. Respect for Nature. A Theory of environmental ethics, 2a. ed., Princeton, Estados Unidos de América: Princeton University Press, 1989.

Cada referencia a un libro se ajustará al siguiente formato: Heisenberg, W., Physics and Philosophy. The Revolution in Modern Science, Harper Torchbooks, Nueva York, 1958, pp.44–58.
Published
2025-04-02
How to Cite
Heras Romero, Y., Morales Guadarrama, A., & Téllez Ballesteros, E. (2025). Responsabilidad compartida entre Ciencia y Bioética en la experimentación con animales. Contactos, Revista De Educación En Ciencias E Ingeniería, (140), 5 - 14. Retrieved from https://contactos.izt.uam.mx/index.php/contactos/article/view/500